1 Introduction

Invasive species pose significant threats to ecosystems, agriculture, and economies worldwide. Among these, the superfamily Curculionoidea, commonly known as weevils, includes numerous invasive pests that have caused extensive damage. This study focuses on the molecular approaches used to identify invasive Curculionoidea, highlighting recent advancements and their implications for pest management. Curculionoidea, commonly referred to as weevils, comprise a large and diverse group of beetles known for their distinctive elongated snouts. This superfamily includes more than 60,000 species, many of which are notorious agricultural pests. Weevils are found in a wide range of habitats, from forests to agricultural fields, where they feed on a variety of plants, causing significant economic damage. Identifying weevils accurately is crucial for effective pest management, given their ability to spread rapidly and adapt to new environments (Schütte et al., 2023).

The accurate identification of invasive species is vital for several reasons. First, invasive species can disrupt local ecosystems, outcompeting native species and leading to biodiversity loss. Second, invasive weevils can cause significant damage to crops, leading to substantial economic losses in agriculture. Finally, effective management strategies depend on accurate species identification to target specific pests and minimize collateral damage to non-target species. Traditional morphological methods often fall short due to the small size and similar appearance of many weevil species, necessitating the use of molecular techniques for precise identification (Sun et al., 2023).

This study aims to summarize current molecular methods, outline the molecular techniques currently used for identifying invasive Curculionoidea, and evaluate the accuracy, efficiency, and practicality of these methods in various contexts. It will discuss recent technological advancements in molecular diagnostics that enhance the identification and management of invasive weevils and provide insights and recommendations for future research and the implementation of molecular techniques in pest management programs.

2 Overview of Invasive Curculionoidea

2.1 Common invasive weevil species

Several weevil species have become invasive pests, causing significant problems in various regions. One notable example is the rice water weevil (Lissorhoptrus oryzophilus), originally from North America. This species has invaded eastern Asia and southern Europe, causing severe damage to rice crops by feeding on roots and stems, significantly impacting agricultural productivity. Another significant invasive species is the polyphagous shot hole borer (Euwallacea fornicatus), a complex of cryptic species. These beetles have spread globally, including in the United States, where they bore into trees and introduce pathogenic fungi, leading to tree mortality.

The fig weevil (Aclees taiwanensis) is another invasive species, originally from Asia. It has been detected in southern Europe, where it threatens fig trees by tunneling into stems and roots, disrupting the phloem flow and leading to tree death (Tani et al., 2023). Additionally, the eucalyptus snout beetle (Gonipterus scutellatus) is part of a complex of cryptic species, including G. platensis and G. pulverulentus, which have become invasive on five continents, causing significant damage to eucalyptus trees (Schröder et al., 2019). These examples highlight the diverse and widespread impact of invasive weevil species across different regions and ecosystems.

2.2 Pathways of introduction and spread

Invasive weevil species are often introduced and spread through several pathways. Global trade is a primary pathway, with weevils hitchhiking on agricultural products, wood, and packaging materials, leading to their inadvertent transport across borders (Sun et al., 2023). For instance, the ornamental plant trade, which involves the movement of bonsai and nursery plants, has facilitated the spread of species like Xylosandrus compactus, a beetle known for its high invasive potential. In addition to human-mediated transport, natural dispersal mechanisms play a role in the spread of invasive weevils. Once established in a new environment, some weevil species can disperse naturally over short distances, expanding their range and colonizing new areas.

The spread of invasive weevils is often facilitated by their high reproductive rates and adaptability to different environmental conditions. These characteristics enable them to quickly establish populations in new regions and outcompete native species. Understanding the pathways of introduction and spread is crucial for developing effective management strategies to prevent the further spread of these invasive pests and mitigate their impacts on ecosystems and agriculture.

2.3 Impact on ecosystems and agriculture

The invasion of Curculionoidea species has profound impacts on both ecosystems and agriculture. Ecologically, invasive weevils can disrupt local ecosystems by outcompeting native species for resources and introducing diseases. For example, the Euwallacea species complex introduces Fusarium fungi into trees, which can lead to significant tree mortality and affect forest health. This disruption can result in the loss of biodiversity and alteration of ecosystem functions. In agriculture, invasive weevils such as Lissorhoptrus oryzophilus and Aegorhinus nodipennis cause extensive damage to crops like rice and fruit trees, leading to substantial economic losses for farmers.

The rice water weevil, for instance, significantly reduces rice yields by damaging the roots and stems of rice plants. Similarly, Aegorhinus nodipennis, a pest in fruit orchards, causes mortality in fruit trees by feeding on their roots and stems. Managing these invasive weevils is challenging due to their rapid reproduction, wide host range, and the limited effectiveness of traditional control methods. Biological control agents and molecular identification techniques are increasingly used to manage these pests (Sun et al., 2023; Park et al., 2018). Effective management strategies are essential to mitigate the ecological and economic impacts of invasive weevils and protect native ecosystems and agricultural productivity.

3 Traditional Identification Methods

3.1 Morphological identification

Traditional methods of identifying Curculionoidea, or weevils, have relied heavily on morphological characteristics and physical examination. This section will discuss the primary methods used, their limitations, and the need for incorporating molecular approaches for more accurate identification. Morphological identification of weevils involves examining physical characteristics such as body shape, size, color, and specific features like the structure of the antennae, rostrum, and elytra. This method is highly detailed and requires significant expertise. For instance, the micromorphology of the elytral cuticle, which includes examining the macrofibers and the angles between successive layers, is one of the intricate methods used to differentiate weevil species (van de Kamp et al., 2016).

The identification process often involves the use of dichotomous keys, which guide the user through a series of choices based on physical traits to reach a species-level identification. Additionally, specialized techniques such as geometric morphometrics, which analyze the shape and size of specific body parts, can also be employed. These methods can be particularly useful in distinguishing between closely related species or in cases where traditional keys are ambiguous (Souza et al., 2020).

3.2 Limitations of traditional methods

Despite the detailed nature of morphological identification, it has several limitations. One significant challenge is the high degree of morphological similarity between some weevil species, especially in their larval or pupal stages. This similarity can lead to misidentification or the inability to identify the species at all.

Morphological identification often requires the collection of intact and well-preserved specimens, which can be difficult when dealing with damaged samples. Another limitation is the reliance on expert knowledge, which is not always readily available, particularly in regions with high biodiversity. Morphological methods are also time-consuming and may not be practical for large-scale surveys or rapid assessments. The detailed examination needed for species differentiation can be labor-intensive, making it challenging to implement on a large scale (Aguirre et al., 2015).

3.3 Need for molecular approaches

Given the limitations of traditional morphological methods, there is a growing need for molecular approaches to identify weevil species accurately and efficiently. Molecular techniques, such as DNA barcoding, offer several advantages over traditional methods. These techniques use short genetic markers, typically from mitochondrial DNA, to identify species based on their genetic sequences. For example, DNA barcoding using the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene has proven effective in distinguishing between closely related species and can be used at any life stage, including eggs, larvae, and pupae (Sun et al., 2023).

Molecular methods are not only faster but also more accurate, as they are less prone to errors caused by morphological similarities or damaged specimens. They can be performed on small tissue samples, making them ideal for use in situations where only partial specimens are available. The implementation of molecular approaches also allows for the creation of comprehensive databases that can be used to identify species globally, facilitating better pest management and biodiversity conservation efforts (Schütte et al., 2023).

4 DNA Barcoding

4.1 Principles and techniques of DNA barcoding

DNA barcoding is a molecular technique used to identify species by analyzing a short, standardized region of their DNA. This method has become increasingly popular for its accuracy, efficiency, and ability to overcome the limitations of traditional morphological identification methods. DNA barcoding relies on the use of specific genetic markers to identify species. The most commonly used marker for animals is the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) gene, which has a high degree of interspecific variability and low intraspecific variation, making it ideal for distinguishing between species. The process involves extracting DNA from a specimen, amplifying the target DNA region using polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and sequencing the amplified product. The obtained sequence is then compared against a reference database, such as the Barcode of Life Data System (BOLD), to determine the species identity based on sequence similarity (DeSalle & Goldstein, 2019).

The COI gene has been widely adopted due to its effectiveness in a variety of taxa, including insects, birds, and fish. Other genetic markers used in plant barcoding include the chloroplast genes matK and rbcL, while the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region is used for fungi. Advances in sequencing technologies have also facilitated the use of whole-genome sequencing for more comprehensive barcoding applications, though this approach is still more resource-intensive compared to single-gene barcoding (Li et al., 2015). The simplicity and reproducibility of the barcoding process have made it a valuable tool for both taxonomists and ecologists, providing a standardized method for species identification across different life stages and geographic regions.

4.2 Application in Curculionoidea identification

The application of DNA barcoding in the identification of Curculionoidea has proven to be particularly effective. Traditional morphological methods often struggle with the high degree of similarity among weevil species, especially in their larval stages. DNA barcoding provides a reliable alternative, allowing for accurate identification across all life stages. For example, the COI gene has been successfully used to barcode various weevil species, facilitating their identification even when morphological differences are subtle or absent. This is crucial for invasive species management, as accurate identification is necessary for implementing effective control measures. In a study on Sitophilus oryzae and S. zeamais, DNA barcoding was able to accurately identify these economically important storage pests, highlighting the utility of this method in agricultural settings.

The Molecular Weevil Identification Project has provided a comprehensive dataset of COI sequences for 1 300 weevil species, linked to morphological vouchers. This integrative approach has resolved many taxonomic ambiguities and enhanced the ability to identify weevil species accurately (Schütte et al., 2023). DNA barcoding has facilitated the discovery of cryptic species and improved our understanding of weevil diversity and distribution. By integrating molecular data with traditional taxonomic methods, researchers can achieve a more holistic understanding of Curculionoidea systematics and ecology.

4.3 Case studies and examples

Several case studies illustrate the successful application of DNA barcoding in Curculionoidea identification. One notable example is the barcoding of Sitophilus species, including the rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) and the maize weevil (Sitophilus zeamais). Using the COI gene, researchers were able to accurately identify these pests across all developmental stages, which is essential for effective pest management in stored grains. Another study focused on the Entiminae subfamily, analyzing genetic distance thresholds for species delimitation. The study found that a threshold of 9.18% was effective for distinguishing over 88% of the species, highlighting the importance of DNA barcoding in resolving taxonomic challenges within this diverse group (Ma et al., 2022).

The Molecular Weevil Identification Project created a curated barcode release of COI sequences for Western Palearctic weevil species. By integrating DNA barcoding with traditional morphological methods, the project significantly improved species identification and taxonomic resolution within Curculionoidea (Schütte et al., 2023). These examples underscore the effectiveness of DNA barcoding in identifying Curculionoidea species, aiding in the management of invasive species and enhancing our understanding of weevil biodiversity. The continued development and application of DNA barcoding techniques are expected to further advance the field of entomology and contribute to more effective conservation and pest management strategies.

5 Genomic Approaches

5.1 Whole genome sequencing

Whole genome sequencing (WGS) involves determining the complete DNA sequence of an organism's genome at a single time. This method has become increasingly accessible and cost-effective due to advances in sequencing technologies. WGS provides comprehensive genetic information, enabling researchers to identify genetic variations, study evolutionary relationships, and develop accurate species identification tools. For instance, the complete mitochondrial genome of the chestnut weevil, Curculio davidi, was assembled using high-coverage Illumina sequencing reads. This genome, which is 16,852 bp long, includes 37 typical mitochondrial genes, providing essential data for species identification and phylogenetic studies (Xu et al., 2017). Similarly, the complete mitochondrial genomes of the rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) and the maize weevil (Sitophilus zeamais) were sequenced, revealing insights into their genetic makeup and evolutionary history (Ojo et al., 2016).

The process of WGS involves extracting DNA from the organism, preparing sequencing libraries, and using high-throughput sequencing platforms to read the DNA. The resulting sequence data are then assembled into a complete genome using bioinformatics tools. This approach allows for the identification of genetic markers, the study of gene functions, and the exploration of genetic diversity within and between species. WGS has proven particularly useful in identifying cryptic species and understanding the genetic basis of phenotypic traits (Keeling et al., 2021).

5.2 Genomic markers for species identification

Genomic markers are specific DNA sequences that can be used to identify species and study genetic relationships. These markers include single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), microsatellites, and specific gene regions. In the context of Curculionoidea, mitochondrial DNA markers, such as the cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) gene, have been widely used for species identification. The mitochondrial genome of Apion squamigerum, for example, was sequenced and analyzed, providing valuable markers for phylogenetic studies within the Brentidae family (Song et al., 2020).

Genomic markers are identified through techniques such as restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (RAD-seq), which generates thousands of markers across the genome. These markers can then be used to construct genetic maps, study population structure, and identify species-specific genetic signatures. In weevils, RAD-seq and other marker-based methods have been employed to resolve taxonomic ambiguities and enhance.

The use of genomic markers extends beyond identification to applications in conservation genetics, where they help in monitoring genetic diversity and managing invasive species. By comparing genetic markers across populations, researchers can infer patterns of gene flow, detect hybridization events, and assess the impact of human activities on genetic diversity (Varghese et al., 2015).

5.3 Comparative genomics

Comparative genomics involves comparing the genomes of different species to understand their evolutionary relationships and functional genomics. This approach provides insights into the genetic basis of adaptation, speciation, and phenotypic diversity. For instance, the mitochondrial genome of the raspberry weevil, Aegorhinus superciliosus, was sequenced and compared with other weevils, supporting the monophyly of the tribe Aterpini and revealing significant genetic divergence.

Comparative genomic studies often use phylogenetic analyses to reconstruct the evolutionary history of species. By aligning genomic sequences and identifying conserved and divergent regions, researchers can infer phylogenetic relationships and track the evolutionary changes that have occurred over time. The study of the genome of the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae, demonstrated the utility of comparative genomics in understanding the genomic architecture underlying range expansions and adaptation to new environments (Keeling et al., 2021).

Furthermore, comparative genomics can identify genomic regions associated with important ecological and biological traits, such as resistance to pesticides or adaptation to different host plants. These insights are crucial for developing targeted management strategies for invasive species and enhancing our understanding of their biology and ecology (Liu and Wen, 2016).

6 Molecular Phylogenetics

6.1 Construction of phylogenetic trees

The construction of phylogenetic trees involves using molecular data to infer the evolutionary relationships among species. This process typically starts with the collection of DNA sequence data from various genes, followed by alignment and analysis using statistical models. Techniques such as Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian Inference (BI) are commonly used to construct phylogenetic trees. For instance, a study on the raspberry weevil (Aegorhinus superciliosus) used mitochondrial genome sequencing to support the monophyly of the tribe Aterpini and the subfamily Cyclominae, highlighting the evolutionary relationships within the Curculionoidea. Another example is the comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of Entimine weevils, which combined molecular and morphological data to test higher-level relationships and naturalness of major tribes, providing a robust phylogenetic framework (Figure 1) (Marvaldi et al., 2018).

Phylogenetic tree construction also involves careful consideration of taxon sampling and selection of appropriate genetic markers. Studies often use multiple genes, including mitochondrial and nuclear DNA, to improve the resolution and accuracy of the phylogenetic trees. For example, a phylogenomic study of weevils using 522 protein-coding genes from various families of Curculionoidea provided strong statistical support for inferred relationships, offering a detailed insight into the weevil phylogeny (Shin et al., 2018).

6.2 Evolutionary relationships among weevils

Understanding the evolutionary relationships among weevils involves examining their genetic data to trace back their lineage and diversification patterns. Molecular phylogenetic studies have revealed significant insights into the evolutionary history of Curculionoidea. For instance, the study on Cryptorhynchinae, a subfamily of highly diverse weevils, suggested an American origin followed by an Australian radiation, illustrating how geographic distribution influences evolutionary patterns (Riedel et al., 2016).

These studies often reveal the monophyly or polyphyly of different weevil groups, indicating whether the groups share a common ancestor or have evolved independently. The phylogenetic analysis of the genus Dichotrachelus, for example, showed that it is isolated within the subfamily Cyclominae and more closely related to South American genera, providing insights into its evolutionary placement (Meregalli et al., 2018). Furthermore, the phylogenetic study of the tribe Acentrusini highlighted its close relationship with other tribes within the subfamily Curculioninae, based on morphological and molecular data (Kostal & Vďačný, 2018).

6.3 Insights into invasion patterns

Molecular phylogenetics also offers valuable insights into the invasion patterns of weevil species. By examining the genetic diversity and evolutionary history, researchers can trace the origins and spread of invasive weevils. For example, the study on Micracidini bark beetles revealed a single trans-Atlantic disjunction, suggesting an Afrotropical ancestor for the New World clade, and provided insights into their ecological adaptations (Jordal and Kaidel, 2016).

These studies also help in understanding the evolutionary mechanisms behind the success of invasive species. The phylogenetic analysis of bark beetles, for instance, clarified the repeated evolutionary origins of inbreeding and fungus farming, which are key strategies contributing to their invasiveness (Johnson et al., 2018). Similarly, the study on the genus Apionini highlighted the ancient co-diversification pattern of weevils and flowering plants, suggesting that host plant shifts have driven the diversification of these weevils (Winter et al., 2017). Overall, molecular phylogenetics provides a powerful tool for unraveling the complex evolutionary relationships and invasion patterns of weevils, aiding in their management and conservation.

7 Environmental DNA (eDNA) Techniques

7.1 Principles of eDNA analysis

Environmental DNA (eDNA) techniques have emerged as powerful tools for monitoring and identifying invasive species in various ecosystems. These methods involve collecting and analyzing DNA from environmental samples, such as soil, water, or air, without the need for capturing or observing the actual organisms. Environmental DNA (eDNA) refers to genetic material obtained directly from environmental samples, such as water, soil, or air, without capturing the organisms themselves. The process begins with the collection of samples from the environment, followed by the extraction and purification of DNA. Key steps include capturing DNA using filtration or precipitation methods, extracting it with chemical or mechanical means, and then amplifying target DNA sequences using techniques like polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The amplified DNA is then sequenced and compared against reference databases to identify the species present in the sample (Bass et al., 2015). eDNA analysis is highly sensitive and can detect even low-abundance species, making it an effective tool for monitoring biodiversity and detecting invasive species (Eichmiller et al., 2016).

Advancements in high-throughput sequencing technologies, such as metabarcoding, allow simultaneous detection of multiple species from a single sample. Metabarcoding involves amplifying and sequencing specific marker genes, like the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) gene or ribosomal RNA genes, from all the DNA present in the sample. This approach can generate comprehensive data on species composition and abundance, providing insights into ecosystem health and species interactions (Kelly et al., 2019).

7.2 Detection of invasive weevils in environmental samples

The detection of invasive weevils using eDNA techniques involves collecting environmental samples from habitats where weevils are suspected to be present. These samples are then processed to extract and amplify weevil-specific DNA. For instance, studies have used specific primers targeting the COI gene to detect invasive weevils like the rice water weevil (Lissorhoptrus oryzophilus) in paddy fields. The extracted eDNA is then subjected to quantitative PCR (qPCR) to quantify the amount of weevil DNA present, allowing for an assessment of their abundance and distribution (Hinlo et al., 2017).

Environmental samples, such as water or soil, are often filtered to concentrate the DNA before extraction. This step is crucial for increasing the detectability of eDNA, especially when dealing with low-abundance species. The choice of filter type and pore size can significantly impact DNA recovery efficiency. Studies have shown that cellulose nitrate filters and ethanol preservation of filters are effective for maximizing DNA yield and stability (Eichmiller et al., 2016).

Moreover, high-throughput sequencing (HTS) technologies have been applied to eDNA samples to perform metabarcoding, enabling the detection of multiple invasive species simultaneously. This approach not only identifies the presence of target weevils but also provides a broader picture of the community structure and potential ecological impacts of the invasion (Shu et al., 2021).

7.3 Advantages and challenges

The use of eDNA techniques offers several advantages for detecting invasive weevils and other species. Firstly, eDNA is non-invasive and does not require direct contact with the organisms, reducing the stress on wildlife and the risk of spreading invasive species during sampling. It also allows for the detection of cryptic or elusive species that are difficult to identify using traditional methods. eDNA analysis is highly sensitive, capable of detecting low-abundance species that might be missed by conventional surveys (Kelly et al., 2019).

However, there are challenges associated with eDNA techniques. One major challenge is the potential for contamination, which can lead to false positives. Ensuring rigorous field and laboratory protocols, including the use of negative controls and replicates, is essential to minimize contamination risks. Another challenge is the degradation of eDNA in the environment, which can vary depending on factors like temperature, UV exposure, and microbial activity. This necessitates timely and proper preservation of samples to maintain DNA integrity (Hinlo et al., 2017).

Moreover, the interpretation of eDNA results can be complex due to the potential presence of DNA from non-target species and environmental factors affecting DNA availability. Developing standardized protocols and improving reference databases are critical steps for enhancing the reliability and comparability of eDNA studies. Despite these challenges, the continued development and refinement of eDNA techniques hold great promise for advancing ecological monitoring and the management of invasive species.

8 Integrated Molecular Approaches

8.1 Combining multiple molecular techniques

Integrated molecular approaches combine multiple molecular techniques to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of species identification and ecological studies. These methods leverage the strengths of various molecular tools, providing a comprehensive framework for studying complex biological questions. Combining multiple molecular techniques involves using a suite of methods such as DNA barcoding, whole genome sequencing (WGS), and environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis. Each technique provides unique insights and, when used together, offers a robust approach to species identification and ecological research. For example, DNA barcoding using the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) gene can quickly identify species, while WGS provides comprehensive genomic data that can elucidate evolutionary relationships and genetic diversity. Environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis further extends these capabilities by enabling the detection of species from environmental samples, allowing for non-invasive monitoring of biodiversity (Schütte et al., 2023).

The Molecular Weevil Identification Project exemplifies the integration of multiple techniques. This project combined DNA barcoding, morphological analysis, and ecological data to create a comprehensive dataset of COI sequences for 1,300 weevil species. This integrative approach resolved many taxonomic ambiguities and enhanced species identification accuracy (Schütte et al., 2023). Additionally, the use of quantitative PCR (qPCR) in eDNA studies allows for the precise quantification of target species, complementing the broad detection capabilities of metabarcoding (Kelly et al., 2019).

8.2 Development of comprehensive identification protocols

Developing comprehensive identification protocols involves standardizing methods to ensure consistency, reliability, and reproducibility in species identification. These protocols often include steps for sample collection, DNA extraction, PCR amplification, sequencing, and data analysis. Standardization is crucial for comparing results across different studies and ensuring that identification methods are applicable in various contexts.

An example of a comprehensive protocol is the use of a multi-gene approach to construct phylogenetic trees, combining mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. This method was used to study the evolutionary relationships among Australian weevils, integrating data from 28S, 16S, and COI genes. The study provided a robust phylogenetic framework and highlighted the importance of taxon sampling in accurate phylogenetic reconstruction (Gunter et al., 2016).

Similarly, the integration of bioinformatics and molecular biology education has been shown to be effective in training researchers. By combining computational and laboratory techniques in a single course, participants gain a holistic understanding of both fields, which is essential for developing and implementing comprehensive identification protocols.

8.3 Case studies of integrated approaches

Several case studies highlight the effectiveness of integrated molecular approaches. One notable example is the study of the endangered weevil Pachyrhynchus sonani in Taiwan. Researchers used an integrated approach combining morphological, genetic, and ecological data to delineate species boundaries and assess cryptic diversity. The study employed morphological measurements, genetic analysis using RAD-seq, and ecological data on host range, revealing two distinct species and highlighting the importance of integrating multiple data sources for accurate species delimitation.

Another case study involved the use of molecular gut-content analysis to study the biological control of the plum curculio (Conotrachelus nenuphar) in organic apple orchards. By combining traditional monitoring techniques with molecular analysis of predator gut contents, researchers identified key biological control agents and gained insights into the predation dynamics within the orchard ecosystem (Schmidt et al., 2016). The integration of multiple molecular approaches provides a powerful framework for addressing complex biological questions. By combining the strengths of various techniques, researchers can achieve a more comprehensive understanding of species diversity, evolutionary relationships, and ecological interactions.

9 Concluding Remarks

The integration of molecular approaches has significantly advanced the field of invasive species identification and management, particularly for the Curculionoidea superfamily. This section summarizes the key findings, emphasizes the importance of molecular identification in managing invasive species, and provides recommendations for future research. Molecular techniques, such as DNA barcoding, whole genome sequencing (WGS), and environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis, have revolutionized the identification of invasive Curculionoidea. DNA barcoding, using the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) gene, has proven effective in distinguishing closely related weevil species. Whole genome sequencing has provided comprehensive genetic information, facilitating the study of evolutionary relationships and genetic diversity. Environmental DNA techniques have enabled non-invasive monitoring of weevil populations in various ecosystems, enhancing early detection and management efforts. Integrated molecular approaches, combining multiple techniques, have offered robust frameworks for species identification, ecological monitoring, and pest management.

Molecular identification methods are crucial for managing invasive species due to their accuracy, efficiency, and ability to detect low-abundance species. Traditional morphological identification methods often struggle with the high degree of similarity among weevil species, especially in their larval stages. Molecular techniques overcome these limitations, providing reliable and rapid identification across all life stages. Accurate identification is essential for implementing effective control measures and preventing the spread of invasive species. For example, the use of species-specific primers in eDNA analysis allows for the early detection of invasive weevils, facilitating timely management interventions. Additionally, molecular approaches provide insights into the genetic basis of invasiveness, helping to develop targeted strategies for managing invasive populations.

Future research should focus on expanding the reference databases for DNA barcoding and WGS to include more Curculionoidea species. This will enhance the accuracy and reliability of molecular identification methods. Additionally, the development of standardized protocols for eDNA collection, extraction, and analysis is essential to ensure consistency and comparability of results across different studies. Research should also explore the potential of integrating molecular techniques with traditional monitoring methods to create comprehensive pest management strategies. For instance, combining molecular gut-content analysis with field surveys can provide a holistic understanding of predator-prey interactions and biological control dynamics. Finally, advancing bioinformatics tools and computational methods will be critical for analyzing the vast amounts of genetic data generated by these molecular techniques, enabling more detailed and accurate studies of invasive species.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank the two anonymous peer reviewers for their suggested revisions to the initial draft of this study.

Conflict of Interest Disclosure

The author affirms that this research was conducted without any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

Aguirre C., Olivares N., Luppichini P., and Hinrichsen P., 2015, A PCR-based diagnostic system for differentiating two weevil species (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) of economic importance to the Chilean citrus industry, Journal of Economic Entomology, 108: 107-113.

https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/tou041
PMid:26470110

Astrin J.J., Stüben P.E., 2008, Phylogeny in cryptic weevils: molecules, morphology and new genera of Western Palaearctic Cryptorhynchinae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), Invertebrate Systematics 22: 503-522.

https://doi.org/10.1071/IS07057

Astrin J.J., Hofer H., Spelda J., Holstein J., Bayer S., Hendrich L., Huber B.A., Kielhorn K.H., Krammer H.J., Lemke M., Monje J.C., Moriniere J., Rulik B., Petersen M., Janssen H., Muster C., (2016), Towards a DNA barcode reference database for spiders and harvestmen of Germany, PLOS One, 11(9): 1-24.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162624
PMid:27681175

Bass D., Stentiford G., Littlewood D., and Hartikainen H., 2015, Diverse applications of environmental DNA methods in parasitology, Trends in Parasitology, 31(10): 499-513.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2015.06.013
PMid:26433253

DeSalle R., and Goldstein P., 2019, Review and interpretation of trends in DNA barcoding, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution.

  https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00302

Eichmiller J. J., Miller L., and Sorensen P., 2016, Optimizing techniques to capture and extract environmental DNA for detection and quantification of fish, Molecular Ecology Resources, 16: 56-67.

https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12421
PMid:25919417

Gunter N., Oberprieler R., and Cameron S., 2016, Molecular phylogenetics of Australian weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionoidea): exploring relationships in a hyperdiverse lineage through comparison of independent analyses, Austral Entomology, 55: 217-233.

https://doi.org/10.1111/aen.12173

Hinlo R., Gleeson D., Lintermans M., and Furlan E., 2017, Methods to maximise recovery of environmental DNA from water samples, PLoS ONE, 12(6): e0179251.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179251
PMid:28604830 PMCid:PMC5467897

Johnson A., Mckenna D., Jordal B., Cognato A., Smith S.M., Lemmon A., Lemmon E.M., and Hulcr J., 2018, Phylogenomics clarifies repeated evolutionary origins of inbreeding and fungus farming in bark beetles (Curculionidae, Scolytinae), Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 127: 229-238.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2018.05.028
PMid:29860101

Jordal B., and Kaidel J., 2016, Phylogenetic analysis of Micracidini bark beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) demonstrates a single trans-Atlantic disjunction and inclusion of Cactopinus in the New World clade, The Canadian Entomologist, 149: 8-25.

 https://doi.org/10.4039/tce.2016.31

Keeling C.I., Campbell E.O., Batista P. D., Shegelski V. A., Trevoy S.A.L., Huber D.P.W., Kelly R.P., Shelton A.O., and Gallego R., 2019, Understanding PCR processes to draw meaningful conclusions from environmental DNA studies, Scientific Reports, 9: 1215-1234.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48546-x
PMid:31431641 PMCid:PMC6702206

Kostal M., and Vďačný P., 2018, On the phylogenetic position of the weevil tribe Acentrusini Alonso-Zarazaga, 2005 (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Curculioninae), Diversity, 10(2): 34.

https://doi.org/10.3390/d10020034

Li X., Yang Y., Henry R., Rossetto M., Wang Y., and Chen S., 2015, Plant DNA barcoding: from gene to genome, Biological Reviews, 90.

https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12104
PMid:24666563

Liu Z., and Wen J., 2016, Transcriptomic analysis of Eucryptorrhynchus chinensis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) using 454 pyrosequencing technology, Journal of Insect Science, 16.

https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/iew067
PMid:27620556 PMCid:PMC5019023

Ma Z., Ren J., and Zhang R., 2022, Identifying the genetic distance threshold for Entiminae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) species delimitation via COI barcodes, Insects, 13.

https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13030261
PMid:35323559 PMCid:PMC8953793

Marvaldi A., Río M., Pereyra V., Rocamundi N., and Lanteri A., 2018, A combined molecular and morphological approach to explore the higher phylogeny of entimine weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), with special reference to South American taxa, Diversity.

https://doi.org/10.3390/d10030095

Medeiros B.A.S. de, and Farrell B., 2018, Whole-genome amplification in double-digest RADseq results in adequate libraries but fewer sequenced loci, PeerJ, 6.

https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5089
PMid:30038852 PMCid:PMC6054070

Meregalli M., Germann C., Bernasconi M.V., and Cervella P., 2018, Phylogeny of the genus Dichotrachelus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Cyclominae), Diversity.

https://doi.org/10.3390/d10030066

Ojo J., Valero M.C., Sun W., Coates B., Omoloye A.A., and Pittendrigh B., 2016, Comparison of full mitochondrial genomes for the rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae and the maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), Agri Gene, 2: 29-37.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aggene.2016.09.007

Park Y.L., Gururajan S., Thistle H., Chandran R., and Reardon R., 2018, Aerial release of Rhinoncomimus latipes (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) to control Persicaria perfoliata (Polygonaceae) using an unmanned aerial system, Pest Management Science, 74(1): 141-148.

https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4670
PMid:28731628

Riedel A., Tänzler R., Pons J., Suhardjono Y. R., and Balke M., 2016, Large-scale molecular phylogeny of Cryptorhynchinae (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) from multiple genes suggests American origin and later Australian radiation, Systematic Entomology, 41.

https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12170

Schmidt J.M., Szendrei Z., and Grieshop M., 2016, Elucidating the common generalist predators of Conotrachelus nenuphar (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in an organic apple orchard using molecular gut-content analysis, Insects, 7.

https://doi.org/10.3390/insects7030029
PMid:27348005 PMCid:PMC5039542

Schröder M.L., Slippers B., Wingfield M., and Hurley B., 2019, Invasion history and management of Eucalyptus snout beetles in the Gonipterus scutellatus species complex, Journal of Pest Science, 93: 11-25.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-019-01156-y

Schütte A., Stüben P. E., and Astrin J., 2023, Molecular weevil identification project: a thoroughly curated barcode release of 1300 Western Palearctic weevil species (Coleoptera, Curculionoidea), Biodiversity Data Journal.

https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.11.e96438
PMid:38357418 PMCid:PMC10865102

Shin S., Clarke D., Lemmon A., Lemmon E.M., Aitken A.L., Haddad S., Farrell B., Marvaldi A., Oberprieler R., and Mckenna D., 2018, Phylogenomic data yield new and robust insights into the phylogeny and evolution of weevils, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 35: 823-836.

https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msx324
PMid:29294021

Shu L., Ludwig A., and Peng Z., 2021, Environmental DNA metabarcoding primers for freshwater fish detection and quantification: in silico and in tanks, Ecology and Evolution, 11: 8281-8294.

https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7658
PMid:34188886 PMCid:PMC8216916

Song N., Li X., Yin X., Li X., Yin S., and Yang M., 2020, The mitochondrial genome of Apion squamigerum (Coleoptera, Curculionoidea, Brentidae) and the phylogenetic implications, PeerJ, 8.

https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8386
PMid:31976182 PMCid:PMC6964704

Souza A.L.S., Multini L.C., Marrelli M.T., and Wilke A., 2020, Wing geometric morphometrics for identification of mosquito species (Diptera: Culicidae) of neglected epidemiological importance, Acta Tropica, 205: 105593.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2020.105593
PMid:32569588

Sun X., Lu G., Sun R., Li Y., Sun S., and Gao L., 2023, An accurate, efficient, and economical identification technology for black twig borer based on species-specific cytochrome C oxidase subunit I PCR assay, Journal of Economic Entomology, 116: 1372-1378.

https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toad119
PMid:37366322

Tani C., Conti B., and Bedini S., 2023, Biological insights on the invasive fig pest Aclees taiwanensis Kȏno, 1933 (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), Insects, 14(3): 223.

https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14030223
PMid:36975908 PMCid:PMC10058888

van de Kamp T.W., Riedel A., and Greven H., 2016, Micromorphology of the elytral cuticle of beetles, with an emphasis on weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionoidea), Arthropod Structure & Development, 45(1): 14-22.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asd.2015.10.002
PMid:26529582

Varghese N., Mukherjee S., Ivanova N.N., Konstantinidis K., Mavrommatis K., Kyrpides N.C., and Pati A., 2015, Microbial species delineation using whole genome sequences, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: 6761-6771.

https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv657
PMid:26150420 PMCid:PMC4538840

Winter S., Friedman A., Astrin J., Gottsberger B., and Letsch H., 2017, Timing and host plant associations in the evolution of the weevil tribe Apionini (Apioninae, Brentidae, Curculionoidea, Coleoptera) indicate an ancient co-diversification pattern of beetles and flowering plants, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 107: 179-190.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2016.10.015
PMid:27789325

Xu Y.D., Guan D., and Xu S., 2017, Characterization of the complete mitochondrial genome of the Chestnut weevil Curculio davidi (Insecta: Coleoptera: Curculionidae), Conservation Genetics Resources, 9: 285-288.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-016-0674-0