1 Introduction

The increasing rates of species extinction and biodiversity loss have become critical global concerns, necessitating a deeper understanding of the processes and mechanisms driving species endangerment. Environmental changes, driven by anthropogenic activities such as habitat alteration, climate change, and pollution, are major contributors to these threats (González‐Suárez and Revilla, 2014; Ducatez and Shine, 2017; Peterson et al., 2017). The impact of these changes is not uniform across species, as different taxa exhibit varying levels of vulnerability due to intrinsic physiological and ecological traits (Bernardo et al., 2007). Understanding these differences is crucial for developing effective conservation strategies. The integration of ecological and conservation biology theories provides a comprehensive framework to assess and mitigate the risks posed by environmental changes (Bro-Jørgensen et al., 2019; Chase et al., 2020).

A robust theoretical framework is essential to systematically evaluate the complex interactions between species and their changing environments. Current conservation efforts often rely on ecological predictors without fully incorporating physiological and genetic factors that influence species' resilience to environmental stressors (Connon et al., 2018). Theories from metacommunity ecology and biophysical ecology offer valuable insights into how species interactions and environmental filtering processes affect biodiversity at multiple scales (Briscoe et al., 2022). By incorporating these theoretical perspectives, conservation biology can better predict species responses to environmental changes and identify critical thresholds for intervention.

This study aims to synthesize existing research on the endangerment processes and mechanisms affecting species, with a focus on the application of ecological and conservation biology theories, and to propose integrative approaches that enhance conservation strategies by bridging gaps between ecological, physiological, and genetic research, expecting to provide a comprehensive understanding of the multifaceted nature of species endangerment and offer actionable insights for policymakers and conservation practitioners.

2 Key Ecological Theories Relevant to Species Endangerment

2.1 Island biogeography theory and its application to habitat fragmentation

The Island Biogeography Theory (IBT), originally formulated by MacArthur and Wilson, provides a foundational framework for understanding species richness in isolated habitats, such as islands. This theory posits that the number of species on an island is determined by a dynamic equilibrium between immigration and extinction rates, which are influenced by the island's size and isolation (Laurance, 2008). In the context of habitat fragmentation, IBT has been applied to predict species diversity in fragmented landscapes, treating habitat patches as "islands" within a "sea" of inhospitable environments (Dondina et al., 2017). However, the theory's applicability is limited by its simplistic assumptions, as it often overlooks factors such as edge effects, the surrounding matrix, and anthropogenic influences that can significantly alter species dynamics in fragmented habitats.

Despite these limitations, IBT remains a crucial tool in conservation biology, providing insights into the effects of area and isolation on species richness. It has been integrated with other ecological theories to better predict biodiversity patterns in fragmented landscapes. For instance, combining IBT with niche theory has revealed complex interactions between habitat heterogeneity and species richness, suggesting that increased habitat heterogeneity can lead to both positive and negative effects on species diversity due to area and dispersal limitations (Kadmon and Allouche, 2007). This integration highlights the need for a more nuanced approach to conservation strategies in fragmented ecosystems.

2.2 Metapopulation theory and species survival in fragmented landscapes

Metapopulation theory offers a complementary perspective to IBT by focusing on the dynamics of species populations across fragmented landscapes. It emphasizes the importance of local population interactions, migration, and the conditions necessary for species persistence in fragmented habitats. Unlike IBT, which primarily considers static factors like area and isolation, metapopulation theory accounts for the dynamic processes of colonization and extinction among habitat patches, providing a more detailed understanding of species survival in fragmented environments (Luo et al., 2021).

This theory is particularly relevant for species that exist in fragmented landscapes, where local extinctions can be offset by recolonization from neighboring patches. The connectivity between these patches is crucial for maintaining genetic diversity and population stability. Studies have shown that maintaining ecological corridors and enhancing habitat connectivity can significantly improve species survival rates in fragmented landscapes (Luo et al., 2021). By focusing on the movement and interaction of species across a network of habitat patches, metapopulation theory provides valuable insights for designing effective conservation strategies that promote long-term species persistence.

2.3 Ecological niche theory and species vulnerability to climate change

Ecological Niche Theory (ENT) is pivotal in understanding species vulnerability to environmental changes, particularly climate change. This theory posits that the distribution and abundance of species are determined by their ecological niches, which are defined by the range of environmental conditions and resources that a species can utilize (Kadmon and Allouche, 2007). As climate change alters these conditions, species with narrow niches or specialized habitat requirements are more vulnerable to extinction due to their limited ability to adapt to new environments.

The integration of ENT with other ecological theories, such as island biogeography, has provided deeper insights into how species richness and community composition are affected by environmental changes. For example, the niche-based theory of island biogeography incorporates climatic niches as predictors of species richness, highlighting the importance of niche diversity in maintaining biodiversity (Beaugrand et al., 2024). This approach underscores the need for conservation strategies that consider the ecological niches of species, promoting resilience to climate change by preserving a diversity of habitats and environmental conditions. By understanding the specific niche requirements of species, conservationists can better predict and mitigate the impacts of climate change on biodiversity.

3 Conservation Biology Theories and Their Role in Understanding Endangerment

3.1 The small population paradigm and extinction risks

The small population paradigm is centered on the idea that small populations are inherently at greater risk of extinction due to stochastic events and genetic factors. This paradigm highlights the role of demographic stochasticity, environmental variability, and genetic drift in increasing extinction probabilities for small populations (Hutchings, 2015). For example, Allee effects, where a positive correlation exists between population size and individual fitness, can lead to critical thresholds below which populations cannot recover, even if external threats are mitigated. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for identifying populations at risk and implementing conservation measures to increase their size and genetic diversity.

Despite its theoretical importance, the small population paradigm has faced criticism for its limited practical application in conservation efforts. Critics argue that it often treats small population size as a cause rather than a consequence of endangerment, thus overlooking the external factors driving population declines. However, by integrating this paradigm with other conservation strategies, such as habitat restoration and threat mitigation, conservationists can address both the symptoms and causes of small population sizes, thereby enhancing the resilience of endangered species.

3.2 The declining population paradigm and conservation strategies

The declining population paradigm focuses on identifying and mitigating the external factors that lead to population declines. This approach is crucial for understanding the specific threats faced by different species and developing targeted conservation strategies (Norris, 2004). For instance, habitat alteration, invasive species, and climate change are significant drivers of extinction risk, with their impacts varying across different taxonomic groups (González‐Suárez and Revilla, 2014). By addressing these threats, conservationists can halt or reverse population declines and improve the prospects for species recovery.

Effective conservation strategies under this paradigm often involve a combination of ecological tools, such as statistical models of habitat use and demographic models, to inform management decisions. These tools help identify critical habitats, assess population trends, and predict the outcomes of conservation interventions. Additionally, incorporating evolutionary theory into the declining population paradigm can enhance the reliability of these tools, particularly when predicting responses to novel environmental conditions (Norris, 2004). By focusing on the causes of population declines and employing a range of management strategies, the declining population paradigm provides a comprehensive framework for conserving biodiversity.

3.3 Genetic bottlenecks and loss of adaptive potential

Genetic bottlenecks occur when populations experience a significant reduction in size, leading to a loss of genetic diversity and adaptive potential. This loss can have severe consequences for species' ability to respond to environmental changes and increases their risk of extinction. The small population paradigm highlights the importance of maintaining genetic diversity to ensure populations can adapt to changing conditions and avoid inbreeding depression (Hutchings, 2015). Conservation efforts must therefore prioritize the preservation of genetic diversity through strategies such as habitat connectivity and managed breeding programs.

The concept of adaptive capacity, which encompasses phenotypic plasticity, dispersal ability, and genetic diversity, is crucial for understanding species' responses to environmental changes. By assessing the adaptive capacity of species, conservationists can identify those most at risk from climate change and other threats and develop strategies to enhance their resilience. This approach emphasizes the need for comprehensive evaluations of genetic diversity and adaptive potential in conservation planning, ensuring that species can withstand future environmental challenges.

4 Major Environmental Changes Contributing to Species Endangerment

4.1 Climate change and its effects on species distribution and survival

Climate change is a predominant factor influencing species distribution and survival. Rising temperatures, altered precipitation patterns, and increased frequency of extreme weather events have led to shifts in species' geographical ranges, often towards the poles or higher elevations (Kerr, 2020). These shifts can result in mismatches between species and their habitats, increasing the risk of local extinctions. For instance, the study on Pseudolarix amabilis highlights how climate change affects species with limited dispersal abilities, suggesting that such species may not fully adapt to new climatic conditions without human intervention (Bai et al., 2018). Furthermore, climate change impacts are often mediated by biotic interactions, such as changes in food availability and predation, which can be more significant than direct abiotic effects.

4.2 Habitat destruction and fragmentation: anthropogenic impacts

Habitat destruction and fragmentation, primarily driven by human activities such as deforestation, urbanization, and land-use change, are critical threats to biodiversity (Sirami et al., 2017). These processes reduce available habitat, isolate populations, and disrupt ecological corridors, leading to declines in species diversity and abundance. The lack of integration between climate change and land-use change studies hampers the development of effective conservation strategies, as these drivers often interact to exacerbate species endangerment. Conservation efforts must prioritize habitat preservation and restoration to mitigate these impacts, focusing on creating ecological corridors and rehabilitating degraded habitats.

4.3 Pollution and its influence on population viability

Pollution, including air and water pollution, poses significant threats to species viability, particularly in aquatic ecosystems (Mulinge, 2023). Pollutants can lead to habitat degradation, reduce reproductive success, and increase mortality rates, thereby decreasing population viability. The effects of pollution are often compounded by other environmental stressors, such as climate change, which can alter the distribution and abundance of species, further threatening their survival. Effective environmental policies and regulations are essential to mitigate pollution's impact on biodiversity and promote sustainable practices.

4.4 Invasive species and their disruptive effects on native ecosystems

Invasive species are a major threat to native ecosystems, often outcompeting native species for resources and altering habitat structures. These species can introduce new diseases, predation pressures, and competition, leading to declines in native biodiversity. The impact of invasive species is particularly pronounced in ecosystems already stressed by other environmental changes, such as climate change and habitat destruction (Ducatez and Shine, 2017). Addressing the threat of invasive species requires comprehensive management strategies that include prevention, early detection, and rapid response to invasions, as well as restoration of affected ecosystems.

5 Mechanisms Driving Species Endangerment

5.1 Loss of genetic diversity and evolutionary potential

The loss of genetic diversity is a critical mechanism driving species endangerment, as it directly impacts a species' ability to adapt to changing environmental conditions. Genetic diversity is essential for the evolutionary potential of species, allowing them to respond to environmental pressures such as climate change and habitat destruction. Studies have shown that habitat loss and fragmentation significantly reduce genetic diversity in mammalian populations, leading to decreased allelic richness and heterozygosity, which are vital for adaptive potential. Furthermore, the reduction of genetic diversity in threatened vertebrates has been linked to inbreeding and genetic drift, which further exacerbate the risk of extinction (Willoughby et al., 2015).

In the context of the Anthropocene, human-induced habitat changes have accelerated the loss of genetic diversity across ecosystems. This loss is not only a concern for currently threatened species but also for those not yet classified as endangered, as their populations and geographic ranges shrink, potentially leading to a rapid decline in genetic diversity (Expósito-Alonso et al., 2021). The reduction in genetic diversity is particularly pronounced in species with large body mass and those dependent on specific habitats, such as forest-dependent species, which are more susceptible to the negative effects of habitat fragmentation (Lino et al., 2019). These findings underscore the importance of preserving genetic diversity to maintain the evolutionary resilience of species in the face of ongoing environmental changes.

5.2 Disruptions in food webs and trophic cascades

Disruptions in food webs and trophic cascades are significant mechanisms contributing to species endangerment. The loss of species diversity can alter the functioning of trophic groups and ecosystems, leading to less efficient resource capture and conversion into biomass (Cardinale et al., 2006). This disruption can have cascading effects throughout the ecosystem, affecting not only the species directly involved but also those that rely on them for survival. For instance, the reduction in species richness can lead to decreased abundance or biomass of focal trophic groups, which in turn affects the entire food web structure.

The impact of biodiversity loss on trophic dynamics is further complicated by the role of dominant species in ecosystems. The “sampling effect” suggests that diverse communities are more likely to contain highly productive species, which can dominate and stabilize ecosystem functions. However, when these key species are lost, the ecosystem's ability to function effectively is compromised, leading to further species declines and potential extinctions. This highlights the interconnectedness of species within ecosystems and the importance of maintaining biodiversity to ensure the stability and resilience of food webs.

5.3 Altered reproductive success and population decline

Environmental changes can lead to altered reproductive success, which is a crucial mechanism driving population decline and species endangerment. Habitat loss and fragmentation can disrupt breeding patterns and reduce the availability of suitable habitats for reproduction, leading to decreased population sizes and increased extinction risk. The reduction in genetic diversity due to habitat fragmentation can also result in lower reproductive success, as inbreeding and genetic drift reduce the overall fitness of populations (Willoughby et al., 2015).

Moreover, anthropogenic disturbances such as habitat modification and climate change can impose additional stress on reproductive processes. For example, changes in temperature and precipitation patterns can affect the timing and success of breeding events, further exacerbating population declines (Hirt et al., 2021). These disruptions in reproductive success highlight the need for conservation strategies that address both the genetic and environmental factors contributing to species endangerment.

5.4 Physiological stress and behavioral changes due to environmental pressures

Physiological stress and behavioral changes induced by environmental pressures are significant mechanisms that contribute to species endangerment. As habitats are altered by human activities, species are forced to adapt to new conditions, which can lead to increased physiological stress and changes in behavior. For instance, habitat loss and fragmentation can limit the space available for species, increasing competition for resources and leading to stress-related declines in health and survival (Hirt et al., 2021).

Behavioral changes, such as altered foraging patterns and migration routes, can also result from environmental pressures. These changes can disrupt established ecological relationships and lead to further declines in population sizes. Additionally, the loss of genetic diversity can exacerbate these effects, as species with reduced genetic variation may lack the adaptive capacity to cope with new environmental challenges (De Almeida-Rocha et al., 2020). Understanding the interplay between physiological stress, behavioral changes, and genetic diversity is crucial for developing effective conservation strategies to mitigate the impacts of environmental pressures on endangered species.

6 Case Study: The Endangerment of Amphibians Due to Environmental Change

6.1 The global amphibian decline crisis

Amphibians are experiencing a significant global decline, with many species facing the threat of extinction. This crisis is largely attributed to a combination of factors, including habitat destruction, climate change, pollution, and disease. A comprehensive assessment indicates that one-third or more of amphibian species are threatened with extinction, a trend exacerbated by their limited geographic ranges and the intense human pressures on their habitats (Wake and Vredenburg, 2008). The decline is particularly severe in tropical regions, where many amphibians have small, specialized habitats that make them vulnerable to environmental changes (Wake and Vredenburg, 2008). The global biodiversity crisis affecting amphibians is a clear indicator of the broader environmental challenges facing ecosystems worldwide.

The decline of amphibians is not only a loss of biodiversity but also a disruption of ecological functions, as amphibians play crucial roles in food webs and nutrient cycling. The ongoing crisis has prompted urgent calls for conservation efforts to mitigate these declines and preserve amphibian diversity. Conservation strategies must address the multifaceted threats facing amphibians, including habitat protection, disease management, and climate change adaptation (Pabijan et al., 2020). The global amphibian decline serves as a stark reminder of the need for comprehensive conservation strategies to protect vulnerable species and maintain ecological balance.

6.2 Climate change and habitat alterations affecting amphibian populations

Climate change is a significant driver of amphibian population declines, affecting their habitats and life cycles. Changes in temperature and precipitation patterns can alter amphibian habitats, impacting their survival, growth, and reproduction (Blaustein et al., 2010). For instance, extreme variations in precipitation, such as droughts and deluges, pose a severe threat to amphibians, whose reproduction is closely tied to water availability (Walls et al., 2013). These climatic changes can disrupt breeding cycles and alter community dynamics, leading to increased competition and predation pressures (Walls et al., 2013).

Moreover, climate change can force amphibians to adapt to new conditions, migrate to suitable habitats, or face extinction. Species inhabiting higher elevations are particularly vulnerable, as they may lose significant portions of their climatically suitable areas (Alves-Ferreira et al., 2022). The interaction of climate change with other stressors, such as UV-B radiation and contaminants, further complicates the survival of amphibian populations (Blaustein et al., 2010). Addressing these challenges requires integrated conservation efforts that consider the complex interactions between climate change and other environmental factors affecting amphibians.

6.3 The impact of disease on amphibian species

Chytridiomycosis, a disease caused by the fungal pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, is one of the most significant threats to amphibian populations worldwide. This disease has been implicated in the decline and extinction of over 200 amphibian species, making it a critical factor in the global amphibian crisis. The spread of chytridiomycosis is exacerbated by global warming, which may enhance the pathogen's virulence and distribution  (Wake and Vredenburg, 2008). The disease affects amphibians by disrupting their skin function, leading to electrolyte imbalances and, ultimately, death.

The impact of chytridiomycosis highlights the need for disease management in amphibian conservation efforts. Strategies to combat this disease include monitoring and controlling its spread, developing disease-resistant amphibian populations, and implementing biosecurity measures in conservation programs (Wake and Vredenburg, 2008). Understanding the interactions between chytridiomycosis and other environmental stressors is crucial for developing effective conservation strategies to protect amphibian species from this devastating disease.

6.4 Conservation Efforts and Lessons Learned from Amphibian Declines

Conservation efforts for amphibians have focused on habitat protection, disease management, and the use of reproductive technologies to support population recovery. Conservation breeding programs have been established to maintain genetically diverse assurance colonies and provide individuals for population augmentation and reestablishment in the wild. These programs utilize reproductive technologies, such as hormone therapies and artificial fertilization, to enhance the propagation and genetic management of threatened species (Figure 1)  (Silla and Byrne, 2019).

Figure 1 Schematic diagram showing how reproductive technologies can generate offspring of known genetic history (Adopted from Silla and Byrne, 2019)

Lessons learned from amphibian declines emphasize the importance of integrating evolutionary principles into conservation strategies. This includes considering genetic diversity, population connectivity, and adaptive potential in conservation planning (Pabijan et al., 2020). Additionally, addressing the multifaceted threats facing amphibians requires a holistic approach that combines habitat protection, disease management, and climate change adaptation. By learning from past declines, conservationists can develop more effective strategies to safeguard amphibian populations and preserve global biodiversity.

7 Strategies for Mitigating Species Endangerment

7.1 Habitat restoration and connectivity corridors

Habitat restoration and the establishment of connectivity corridors are critical strategies for mitigating species endangerment. The loss and fragmentation of habitats are major threats to biodiversity, as they isolate populations and reduce genetic diversity. Connectivity corridors help maintain genetic flow between isolated populations, which is essential for their long-term survival and adaptation to environmental changes (Bergès et al., 2019; Ashrafzadeh et al., 2020). These corridors facilitate movement and dispersal, allowing species to access different habitats necessary for their lifecycle, such as breeding and feeding grounds (Joly, 2019). Moreover, habitat restoration efforts aim to rehabilitate degraded ecosystems, enhancing their capacity to support diverse species and ecological processes (Chase et al., 2020).

The implementation of habitat connectivity models, such as the landscape connectivity metric equivalent connectivity (EC), can significantly improve the effectiveness of these strategies. By incorporating spatial configurations into conservation planning, these models help identify critical areas for restoration and corridor establishment, ensuring that conservation efforts are both efficient and effective. This approach not only aids in preserving biodiversity but also supports ecosystem services that are vital for human well-being.

7.2 Ex-situ conservation and captive breeding programs

Ex-situ conservation and captive breeding programs play a pivotal role in species conservation, particularly for those facing imminent extinction. These programs involve the breeding and maintenance of species outside their natural habitats, providing a safeguard against extinction while efforts are made to restore their natural environments (McGowan et al., 2017). The IUCN guidelines emphasize a structured approach to ex-situ management, ensuring that these programs are strategically aligned with broader conservation goals.

Captive breeding programs must also focus on maintaining the genetic diversity and natural behaviors of species to ensure their successful reintroduction into the wild. This includes addressing the “captivity effect”, where animals may lose essential survival skills due to the artificial conditions of captivity (Clark et al., 2023). By incorporating cognitive and behavioral enrichment, these programs can better prepare species for the challenges of reintroduction, increasing their chances of survival in changing environments.

7.3 Genetic interventions and assisted migration

Genetic interventions, such as genetic rescue and assisted migration, are increasingly recognized as essential tools in conservation biology. These strategies aim to enhance genetic diversity and adaptability in populations threatened by inbreeding and environmental changes (Hoffmann et al., 2020). Genetic rescue involves the introduction of new genetic material to small, isolated populations to increase their genetic diversity and fitness, while assisted migration involves relocating species to areas with more suitable environmental conditions.

These interventions require careful consideration of the genetic and ecological characteristics of both source and recipient populations to avoid potential negative impacts, such as outbreeding depression. By integrating genetic and genomic approaches into conservation planning, these strategies can be effectively implemented to support species adaptation to climate change and other anthropogenic pressures (Wikelski and Cooke, 2020).

7.4 Policy and legal frameworks for species protection

Robust policy and legal frameworks are essential for the effective protection of endangered species. These frameworks provide the necessary legal backing for conservation actions, such as habitat protection, regulation of human activities, and enforcement of conservation laws. Policies must be informed by scientific research to address the specific threats faced by different species and ecosystems, ensuring that conservation efforts are targeted and effective (Ducatez and Shine, 2017).

International agreements, such as the Convention on Biological Diversity, play a crucial role in setting global conservation targets and facilitating cooperation among countries. National and regional policies must align with these international commitments, incorporating scientific insights into the development and implementation of conservation strategies. By fostering collaboration between governments, scientists, and conservation organizations, policy frameworks can drive meaningful progress in species conservation and biodiversity protection (Wikelski and Cooke, 2020).

8 Future Research Directions in Species Endangerment and Conservation

8.1 Integrating genomic tools in conservation planning

The integration of genomic tools into conservation planning represents a promising frontier for enhancing the effectiveness of conservation strategies. Genomic technologies can provide detailed insights into the genetic diversity and structure of endangered populations, which are crucial for developing targeted conservation actions. Recent advances in wildlife reproduction science, including the use of genomic tools, have the potential to revolutionize conservation breeding programs by enabling precision conservation breeding. This approach can help maintain genetic diversity and adapt populations to changing environmental conditions (Comizzoli and Holt, 2019). Moreover, genomic tools can assist in identifying genetic markers associated with resilience to environmental stressors, thereby informing conservation strategies that enhance the adaptive capacity of species.

Despite these advancements, challenges remain in the widespread application of genomic tools in conservation. There is a need for more research to integrate these tools into existing conservation frameworks effectively. This includes developing methodologies for applying genomic data to real-world conservation problems and ensuring that conservation practitioners have the necessary skills and resources to utilize these technologies. Addressing these challenges will require interdisciplinary collaboration and investment in capacity-building initiatives, particularly in regions with high biodiversity and limited resources.

8.2 Predictive modeling for species at risk

Predictive modeling is a critical tool for identifying species at risk and informing conservation strategies. By simulating future scenarios, predictive models can help anticipate the impacts of environmental changes on species distributions and identify potential refugia. For instance, ecological niche models have been used to predict the distributional dynamics of vulnerable species in response to climate change, providing valuable insights into potential future habitats and migration patterns (Bai et al., 2018). These models can guide conservation efforts by identifying areas where interventions such as assisted migration may be necessary to preserve species threatened by rapid climate change.

However, the effectiveness of predictive models depends on the quality and comprehensiveness of the data used. Many models currently lack integration of key threat variables, such as habitat loss and invasive species, which can significantly affect their predictive accuracy and utility in conservation planning (Murray et al., 2014). Future research should focus on improving the incorporation of these variables into models and developing more robust analytical methods that can provide actionable insights for conservation practitioners.

8.3 The role of community-based conservation approaches

Community-based conservation approaches are increasingly recognized as vital for the success of conservation initiatives. Engaging local communities in conservation efforts can enhance the sustainability of these initiatives by aligning them with local needs and knowledge. For example, involving communities in the management of invasive species and habitat restoration has been shown to improve conservation outcomes for threatened seabirds like petrels. Community engagement can also foster a sense of stewardship and responsibility towards local biodiversity, which is crucial for long-term conservation success.

Despite their potential, community-based approaches face several challenges, including socioeconomic and cultural barriers that can hinder effective participation. Future research should explore strategies to overcome these barriers and enhance community involvement in conservation. This includes developing frameworks for equitable benefit-sharing and capacity-building initiatives that empower communities to take an active role in conservation.

8.4 Addressing socioeconomic challenges in conservation strategies

Socioeconomic factors play a significant role in shaping conservation outcomes, particularly in regions with high biodiversity and limited resources. Poverty and poor governance can compromise conservation efforts by limiting the capacity of countries to implement effective strategies (Giam et al., 2010). Addressing these challenges requires a holistic approach that integrates conservation with socioeconomic development. For instance, improving economic conditions and governance quality in biodiversity-rich countries can enhance their ability to protect threatened species and habitats.

Future research should focus on identifying and implementing strategies that address the root socioeconomic causes of biodiversity loss. This includes exploring policy interventions that promote sustainable development and conservation simultaneously. Additionally, there is a need for research that examines the effectiveness of different governance models in supporting conservation efforts and identifies best practices that can be adapted to local contexts.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend sincere thanks to two anonymous peer reviewers for their feedback on the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Disclosure

The authors affirm that this research was conducted without any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

Alves-Ferreira G., Talora D., Solé M., Cervantes-López M., and Heming N., 2022, Unraveling global impacts of climate change on amphibians distributions: a life-history and biogeographic-based approach, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 10: 987237.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2022.987237

Ashrafzadeh M., Khosravi R., Adibi M., Taktehrani A., Wan H., and Cushman S., 2020, A multi-scale, multi-species approach for assessing effectiveness of habitat and connectivity conservation for endangered felids, Biological Conservation, 245: 108523.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108523

Bai Y., Wei X., and Li X., 2018, Distributional dynamics of a vulnerable species in response to past and future climate change: a window for conservation prospects, PeerJ, 6: e4287.

https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4287

Beaugrand G., Kléparski L., Luczak C., Goberville E., and Kirby R., 2024, A niche‐based theory of island biogeography, Ecology and Evolution, 14(6): e11540.

https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.11540

Bergès L., Avon C., Bezombes L., Clauzel C., Duflot R., Foltête J., Gaucherand S., Girardet X., and Spiegelberger T., 2019, Environmental mitigation hierarchy and biodiversity offsets revisited through habitat connectivity modelling, Journal of Environmental Management, 256: 109950.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109950

Bernardo J., Ossola R., Spotila J., and Crandall K., 2007, Interspecies physiological variation as a tool for cross-species assessments of global warming-induced endangerment: validation of an intrinsic determinant of macroecological and phylogeographic structure, Biology Letters, 3: 695-699.

https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2007.0259

Blaustein A., Walls S., Bancroft B., Lawler J., Searle C., and Gervasi S., 2010, Direct and indirect effects of climate change on amphibian populations, Diversity, 2: 281-313.

https://doi.org/10.3390/d2020281

Briscoe N., Morris S., Mathewson P., Buckley L., Jusup M., Levy O., Maclean I., Pincebourde S., Riddell E., Roberts J., Schouten R., Sears M., and Kearney M., 2022, Mechanistic forecasts of species responses to climate change: the promise of biophysical ecology, Global Change Biology, 29: 1451-1470.

https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16557

Bro-Jørgensen J., Franks D., and Meise K., 2019, Linking behaviour to dynamics of populations and communities: application of novel approaches in behavioural ecology to conservation, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 374(1781): 20190008.

https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0008

Cardinale B., Srivastava D., Duffy E., Wright J., Downing A., Sankaran M., and Jouseau C., 2006, Effects of biodiversity on the functioning of trophic groups and ecosystems, Nature, 443: 989-992.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05202

Chase J., Jeliazkov A., Ladouceur E., and Viana D., 2020, Biodiversity conservation through the lens of metacommunity ecology, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1469(1): 86-104.

https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.1437

Clark F., Greggor A., Montgomery S., and Plotnik J., 2023, The endangered brain: actively preserving ex-situ animal behaviour and cognition will benefit in-situ conservation, Royal Society Open Science, 10(8): 230707.

https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.230707

Comizzoli P., and Holt W., 2019, Breakthroughs and new horizons in reproductive biology of rare and endangered animal species, Biology of Reproduction, 101: 514-525.

https://doi.org/10.1093/biolre/ioz031

Connon R., Jeffries K., Komoroske L., Todgham A., and Fangue N., 2018, The utility of transcriptomics in fish conservation, Journal of Experimental Biology, 221(2): jeb148833.

https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.148833

De Almeida-Rocha J., Soares L., De Andrade E., Gaiotto F., and Cazetta E., 2020, The impact of anthropogenic disturbances on the genetic diversity of terrestrial species: a global meta‐analysis, Molecular Ecology, 29: 4812-4822.

https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15688

Dondina O., Orioli V., D’Occhio P., Luppi M., and Bani L., 2017, How does forest species specialization affect the application of the island biogeography theory in fragmented landscapes?, Journal of Biogeography, 44(5): 1041-1052.

https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12827

Ducatez S., and Shine R., 2017, Drivers of extinction risk in terrestrial vertebrates, Conservation Letters, 10(2): 186-194.

https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12258

Expósito-Alonso M., Booker T., Czech L., Fukami T., Gillespie L., Hateley S., Kyriazis C., Lang P., Leventhal L., Nogués-Bravo D., Pagowski V., Ruffley M., Spence J., Arana S., Weiß C., and Zess E., 2021, Genetic diversity loss in the Anthropocene, Science, 377(6613): 1431-1435.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abn5642

Giam X., Bradshaw C., Tan H., and Sodhi N., 2010, Future habitat loss and the conservation of plant biodiversity, Biological Conservation, 143: 1594-1602.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.04.019

González-Suárez M., and Revilla E., 2014, Generalized drivers in the mammalian endangerment process, PLOS ONE, 9(2): e90292.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090292

Hirt M., Barnes A., Gentile A., Pollock L., Rosenbaum B., Thuiller W., Tucker M., and Brose U., 2021, Environmental and anthropogenic constraints on animal space use drive extinction risk worldwide, Ecology Letters, 24(12): 2576-2585.

https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13872

Hoffmann A., Miller A., and Weeks A., 2020, Genetic mixing for population management: from genetic rescue to provenancing, Evolutionary Applications, 14: 634-652.

https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.13154

Hutchings J., 2015, Thresholds for impaired species recovery, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282(1809): 20150654.

https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.0654

Joly P., 2019, Behavior in a changing landscape: using movement ecology to inform the conservation of pond-breeding amphibians, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 7: 155.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00155

Kadmon R., and Allouche O., 2007, Integrating the effects of area, isolation, and habitat heterogeneity on species diversity: a unification of island biogeography and niche theory, The American Naturalist, 170: 443-454.

https://doi.org/10.1086/519853

Kerr J., 2020, Racing against change: understanding dispersal and persistence to improve species’ conservation prospects, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 287(1939): 20202061.

https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.2061

Laurance W., 2008, Theory meets reality: how habitat fragmentation research has transcended island biogeographic theory, Biological Conservation, 141: 1731-1744.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.05.011

Lino A., Fonseca C., Rojas D., Fischer E., and Pereira M., 2019, A meta-analysis of the effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on genetic diversity in mammals, Mammalian Biology, 94: 69-76.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2018.09.006

Luo Y., Wu J., Wang X., Zhao Y., and Feng Z., 2021, Understanding ecological groups under landscape fragmentation based on network theory, Landscape and Urban Planning, 210: 104066.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104066

McGowan P., Traylor-Holzer K., and Leus K., 2017, IUCN guidelines for determining when and how ex situ management should be used in species conservation, Conservation Letters, 10(3): 361-366.

https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12285

Mulinge J., 2023, Effects of environmental change on species diversity, International Journal of Biology, 3(1): 43-53.

https://doi.org/10.47604/ijb.2014

Murray K., Arregoitia L., Davidson A., Di Marco M., and Di Fonzo M., 2014, Threat to the point: improving the value of comparative extinction risk analysis for conservation action, Global Change Biology, 20(2): 483-494.

https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12366

Norris K., 2004, Managing threatened species: the ecological toolbox, evolutionary theory and declining-population paradigm, Journal of Applied Ecology, 41: 413-426.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00910.x

Pabijan M., Palomar G., Antunes B., Antoł W., Zieliński P., and Babik W., 2020, Evolutionary principles guiding amphibian conservation, Evolutionary Applications, 13: 857-878.

https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12940

Peterson E., Buchwalter D., Kerby J., LeFauve M., Varian-Ramos C., and Swaddle J., 2017, Integrative behavioral ecotoxicology: bringing together fields to establish new insight to behavioral ecology, toxicology, and conservation, Current Zoology, 63: 185-194.

https://doi.org/10.1093/cz/zox010

Silla A., and Byrne P., 2019, The role of reproductive technologies in amphibian conservation breeding programs, Annual Review of Animal Biosciences, 7: 499-519.

https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-020518-115056

Sirami C., Caplat P., Popy S., Clamens A., Arlettaz R., Jiguet F., Brotóns L., and Martin J., 2017, Impacts of global change on species distributions: obstacles and solutions to integrate climate and land use, Global Ecology and Biogeography, 26: 385-394.

https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12555

Wake D., and Vredenburg V., 2008, Are we in the midst of the sixth mass extinction? A view from the world of amphibians, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105: 11466-11473.

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0801921105

Walls S., Barichivich W., and Brown M., 2013, Drought, deluge and declines: the impact of precipitation extremes on amphibians in a changing climate, Biology, 2: 399-418.

https://doi.org/10.3390/biology2010399

Wikelski M., and Cooke S., 2020, Conservation physiology, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21(1): 38-46.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.10.018

Willoughby J., Sundaram M., Wijayawardena B., Kimble S., Ji Y., Fernández N., Antonides J., Lamb M., Marra N., and Dewoody J., 2015, The reduction of genetic diversity in threatened vertebrates and new recommendations regarding IUCN conservation rankings, Biological Conservation, 191: 495-503.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.07.025