1 Introduction

Honeybees (Apis mellifera) are indispensable to both natural ecosystems and agricultural systems due to their role as primary pollinators. They contribute significantly to the pollination of wildflowers and cultivated crops, which is essential for maintaining biodiversity and ensuring food production (Papa et al., 2022; Lin et al., 2023a). The pollination services provided by honeybees enhance crop yield and quality, meeting the increasing global food demand. Additionally, honeybees serve as bioindicators of environmental health, reflecting the presence of pollutants such as pesticides and heavy metals (Papa et al., 2022).

The global decline in honeybee populations has raised significant concerns due to the multifactorial threats they face, including biotic and abiotic stressors. These stressors range from parasitic mites and invasive species to pesticide exposure and habitat loss (Leza et al., 2019; Morales et al., 2019; Lin et al., 2023a). The presence of invasive species like Vespa velutina has been shown to negatively impact honeybee health by increasing oxidative stress, which can make them more susceptible to other stressors (Leza et al., 2019). Furthermore, the widespread use of pesticides has been linked to the decline in bee abundance and diversity, which in turn affects pollination services and agricultural productivity (Kom et al., 2019). The decline in honeybee populations is a global issue that threatens food security and ecosystem stability.

This study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the crucial role of honeybees in ecosystems and agriculture. It will explore the various ecosystem services provided by honeybees, including pollination and their role as bioindicators. The study will also examine the global significance of honeybee populations, focusing on the multifactorial threats they face and the implications of their decline. By synthesizing current research, this study hopes to highlight the importance of honeybee conservation and the need for sustainable practices to ensure their survival and the continued provision of essential ecosystem services.

2 Biology and Behavior of Honeybees

2.1 Description of Honeybee Species, with a Focus on Apis mellifera

The Western honeybee, Apis mellifera, is a species of significant economic and ecological importance. It is widely studied due to its role in pollination and honey production. The genome of A. mellifera was one of the first insect genomes to be sequenced, providing a wealth of genetic information that has facilitated numerous studies on its biology and behavior (Yokoi et al., 2022). This species is known for its complex social structure and behaviors, which are critical for the survival and efficiency of the colony. A. mellifera is also notable for its adaptability to various environments, which has allowed it to become a cosmopolitan species, thriving in diverse habitats around the world (Gross et al., 2019).

2.2 Social structure and division of labor within a honeybee colony

Honeybee colonies exhibit a highly organized social structure characterized by a division of labor among different castes. The colony is primarily composed of a single reproductive queen, numerous sterile female workers, and a few male drones. The queen's primary role is to lay eggs, while the workers perform various tasks such as foraging, nursing the brood, and maintaining the hive. This division of labor is regulated by both genetic and environmental factors, including pheromones produced by the queen, such as the queen mandibular pheromone (QMP), which helps maintain social order and suppresses the reproductive capabilities of the workers (Lovegrove et al., 2020). Additionally, social immunity behaviors, such as hygienic behavior and social segregation, play a crucial role in protecting the colony from pathogens (Laomettachit et al., 2021).

2.3 Honeybee foraging behavior and its impact on pollination

Foraging behavior in honeybees is a critical activity that links the colony to its environment. Honeybees forage for nectar and pollen, which are essential for the colony's nutrition and energy needs. This behavior is influenced by various factors, including the availability of floral resources and the colony's internal nutritional status (Abou-Shaara, 2018; Hendriksma et al., 2019). Honeybees use a sophisticated communication system, including the famous "waggle dance," to inform other foragers about the location of food sources. This collective foraging behavior ensures efficient resource exploitation and enhances the colony's overall productivity (Hasenjager et al., 2023).

The impact of honeybee foraging on pollination is profound. As honeybees visit flowers to collect nectar and pollen, they inadvertently transfer pollen from one flower to another, facilitating cross-pollination. This process is vital for the reproduction of many flowering plants and the production of fruits and seeds. Honeybees are considered one of the most effective pollinators due to their foraging efficiency and the large number of individuals involved in foraging activities (Dáttilo et al., 2022; Lin et al., 2023b). However, the presence of invasive honeybee species, such as Apis cerana, can lead to interspecific competition and affect the foraging dynamics and pollination efficiency of A. mellifera (Gross et alk., 2019; Rano et al., 2022).

3 Honeybees as Pollinators in Natural Ecosystems

3.1 The role of honeybees in pollinating wild plants

Honeybees (Apis mellifera) play a significant role in the pollination of wild plants, contributing to the reproductive success and genetic diversity of numerous plant species. They are the most frequent floral visitors in natural habitats worldwide, averaging 13% of floral visits across various ecosystems. This high visitation rate underscores their importance in maintaining the reproductive cycles of wild plants, which is crucial for the stability and resilience of natural ecosystems. However, it is important to note that while honeybees are effective pollinators, they are not the sole contributors to pollination, as many plant species also rely on other pollinators (Hung et al., 2018).

3.2 Impact of honeybee pollination on biodiversity and ecosystem stability

The presence of honeybees in natural ecosystems can have both positive and negative impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem stability. On the positive side, honeybees contribute to the pollination of a wide range of plant species, which supports plant biodiversity and ecosystem functioning (Papa et al., 2022) (Figure 1). However, high-density beekeeping can disrupt the structure and functionality of plant-pollinator networks, leading to a reduction in the diversity of wild pollinators and the loss of interactions by generalist species. This disruption can impair pollination services provided by wild pollinators and reduce the reproductive success of plant species highly visited by honeybees, ultimately affecting ecosystem stability (Valido et al., 2019).

3.3 Comparison of honeybee pollination with other pollinators in natural ecosystems

While honeybees are prominent pollinators, they are not always the most effective compared to other pollinators. Studies have shown that wild insects, such as native bees, butterflies, and other pollinators, can be more effective in certain contexts. For instance, wild insects were found to be more effective than honeybees in pollinating avocado trees, highlighting the importance of maintaining diverse pollinator communities (Celis-Diez et al., 2023). Additionally, urbanization tends to favor non-native pollinators, which can exacerbate conservation risks to native species and affect pollinator diversity (Liang et al., 2023). Therefore, while honeybees are valuable pollinators, the conservation of a diverse array of pollinators is crucial for the health and stability of natural ecosystems (Basu and Cetzal-IX, 2018).

4 Honeybees in Agricultural Systems

4.1 Importance of Honeybees for Crop Pollination and Agricultural Productivity

Honeybees play a pivotal role in the pollination of a wide variety of crops, significantly enhancing agricultural productivity. They are responsible for pollinating approximately one-third of the total human dietary supply, making them indispensable for global food security (Khalifa et al., 2021). Honeybees are particularly effective pollinators due to their ability to visit a large number of flowers and their specialized body structures that facilitate pollen transfer (Joshi et al., 2021). Their contribution is not limited to the quantity of the yield but also extends to the quality of the produce, improving the size, shape, and nutritional value of fruits and vegetables (Joshi et al., 2021; Khalifa et al., 2021) (Figure 2). The efficiency of honeybees in pollination is further underscored by their ability to pollinate about 300 million flowers daily (Joshi et al., 2021).

4.2 Economic value of honeybee pollination services to agriculture

The economic value of honeybee pollination services is substantial. Globally, the economic benefit of bee pollination to food production is estimated to be around USD 200 billion annually (Hristov et al., 2020). In Ethiopia, for instance, the economic value of pollination services was estimated at $815.2 million for the 2015/16 crop production season, highlighting the significant financial impact of honeybee pollination on agricultural productivity (Alebachew, 2018). The value of additional yields obtained through honeybee pollination is reported to be 15-20 times more than the value of all hive products combined, emphasizing the critical economic role of honeybees beyond honey production (Alebachew, 2018). This economic valuation underscores the necessity of protecting and promoting honeybee populations to sustain agricultural economies (Alebachew, 2018; Hristov et al., 2020).

4.3 The dependency of various crops on honeybee pollination

Many crops are highly dependent on honeybee pollination for optimal yield and quality. Approximately 84% of commercial crops are insect-pollinated, with honeybees accounting for 70%-80% of this pollination. Crops such as almonds, apples, onions, and faba beans have shown significant yield improvements due to honeybee pollination, with yield increments ranging from 33.5% to 84% (Bareke and Addi, 2019). In the USA, a nationwide study found that five out of seven major crops showed evidence of pollinator limitation, indicating a high dependency on both wild and managed bees, including honeybees, for adequate pollination (Reilly et al., 2020). The dependency on honeybee pollination is not only crucial for crop yield but also for maintaining the biodiversity of agricultural ecosystems, as honeybees facilitate the growth of various plants that serve as food and habitat for other organisms (Hristov et al., 2020; Reilly et al., 2020).

In summary, honeybees are integral to agricultural systems, providing essential pollination services that enhance crop productivity, contribute significantly to the economy, and support the biodiversity of agricultural landscapes. Protecting honeybee populations is therefore vital for sustaining agricultural productivity and economic stability.

5 Case Study: The Impact of Honeybees on Almond Production in California

5.1 Overview of almond production in california and its reliance on honeybees

California is the leading producer of almonds globally, with the state's almond orchards requiring extensive pollination services to ensure successful nut set. Each year, over two million honey bee hives are transported to California to pollinate almond trees during their bloom period in February and March (Champetier et al., 2019). The reliance on honeybees (Apis mellifera) is critical due to the self-incompatibility of most almond varieties, which necessitates cross-pollination facilitated by these bees (Alomar et al., 2018. The demand for honeybee colonies has increased significantly, leading to higher rental prices and logistical challenges in meeting the pollination needs of the expanding almond acreage.

5.2 Challenges faced by honeybees in almond orchards

Honeybees in almond orchards face several challenges that can impact their health and pollination efficiency. One major issue is exposure to pesticides, including insect growth regulators, fungicides, and organosilicone surfactants, which can be sublethally or synergistically toxic to bees (Fisher et al., 2018; Durant et al., 2020). Additionally, habitat loss and lack of forage diversity in the surrounding landscapes can weaken bee colonies, reducing their effectiveness in pollination (Smart et al., 2018). The transportation of bee colonies over long distances to meet the pollination demand also adds stress to the bees, potentially affecting their health and productivity.

5.3 Strategies to enhance honeybee health and pollination efficiency in almond production

To mitigate the challenges faced by honeybees and enhance their health and pollination efficiency, several strategies can be implemented. One approach is the integration of alternative pollinators, such as the blue orchard bee (Osmia lignaria), which has shown promise in increasing nut set and yield when used alongside honeybees (Pitts-Singer et al., 2018; Boyle et al., 2020) (Figure 3; Table 1). Additionally, promoting the planting of wildflowers and maintaining natural habitats around almond orchards can provide essential forage for bees, supporting their health and reproductive success (Alomar et al., 2018; Boyle et al., 2020). Reducing the use of bee-toxic pesticides during bloom and improving communication between growers and beekeepers can also help minimize the risks to bee colonies (Durant et al., 2020; Durant and Ponisio, 2021). Implementing these strategies can contribute to more sustainable and efficient almond production in California.

6 Threats to Honeybee Populations

6.1 Overview of factors contributing to honeybee decline

Honeybee populations are facing a multitude of threats that contribute to their decline. These threats can be broadly categorized into biotic and abiotic stressors. Biotic stressors include ectoparasitic mites such as Varroa destructor, which are central to honeybee health issues, as well as vectored viruses, invasive species like giant hornets and small hive beetles, and microbial infections (El-Seedi et al., 2022; Lin et al., 2023a). Abiotic stressors encompass a range of environmental factors such as the widespread use of agrochemicals, including neonicotinoids and acaricides, which have been documented to adversely affect bee health (Lin et al., 2023a; Moorthy et al., 2023). Additionally, habitat loss due to urbanization and agricultural intensification, as well as improper beekeeping practices, further exacerbate the decline in honeybee populations (Donkersley et al., 2020; El-Seedi et al., 2022; Lin et al., 2023a).

6.2 The impact of climate change on honeybee populations

Climate change poses a significant threat to honeybee populations by altering their natural habitats and the availability of floral resources. Increasing temperatures and changing precipitation patterns can lead to habitat fragmentation and the loss of flower-rich areas essential for foraging (Janousek et al., 2023; Lin et al., 2023a). Studies have shown that climate change, along with other stressors, can negatively impact bee health and contribute to population declines. For instance, rising temperatures and drought conditions have been linked to the decline of the western bumblebee, a close relative of the honeybee, indicating similar vulnerabilities in honeybee populations (Janousek et al., 2023). The combined effects of climate change and other environmental stressors can lead to reduced colony resilience and increased susceptibility to diseases and parasites (Becher et al., 2018).

6.3 Consequences of declining honeybee populations on ecosystems and agriculture

The decline in honeybee populations has far-reaching consequences for both ecosystems and agriculture. Honeybees are critical pollinators, responsible for the pollination of up to 87.5% of flowering and edible plants, which includes a wide range of crops such as fruits, vegetables, and nuts (Moorthy et al., 2023). The reduction in honeybee populations can lead to decreased crop yields and quality, threatening food security and agricultural sustainability (Kovács-Hostyánszki et al., 2019; Moorthy et al., 2023). Additionally, the loss of honeybees can disrupt plant-pollinator networks, leading to cascading effects on biodiversity and ecosystem stability (Kovács-Hostyánszki et al., 2019). The decline in pollinator services can result in an imbalanced diet for humans, as the availability of nutritious crops diminishes, potentially leading to increased reliance on staple crops like rice, maize, and potatoes (Moorthy et al., 2023). Therefore, protecting honeybee populations is crucial for maintaining ecosystem health and ensuring the continued provision of essential pollination services.

By addressing these threats through integrated management approaches and policy reforms, it is possible to mitigate the decline of honeybee populations and safeguard their vital role in ecosystems and agriculture (Donkersley et al., 2020).

7 Conservation Strategies for Honeybees

7.1 Habitat restoration and conservation practices to support honeybee populations

Habitat restoration is a critical strategy for supporting honeybee populations. Ecological restoration efforts, such as restoring former agricultural fields to historic vegetation types or improving degraded natural lands, have shown positive effects on wild bee abundance and richness. These efforts often focus on plant community goals, which can have ancillary benefits for bees by providing necessary nesting and foraging resources (Tonietto and Larkin, 2018). Additionally, the conservation potential of forests, particularly those with high densities of tree cavities, is significant for sustaining wild honeybee colonies. European forests, for example, have been identified as potential conservation hotspots for wild honeybees, highlighting the importance of forest management in bee conservation (Requier et al., 2019a).

7.2 Sustainable agricultural practices to protect honeybees

Sustainable agricultural practices are essential to protect honeybees from various threats. Increasing flower species richness and density in agricultural landscapes, such as through the implementation of wildflower strips along field margins, can enhance bee abundance and reduce competition for resources among different bee species (Doublet et al., 2022). Moreover, limiting the use of synthetic pesticides and promoting organic farming practices can mitigate the adverse effects of agrochemicals on bee health (Wakgari and Yigezu, 2021; Lin et al., 2023a). The integration of ecological intensification in farming systems, which focuses on diversifying crops and improving habitat quality, can further support bee populations and enhance pollination services.

7.3 Role of public awareness and policy in honeybee conservation

Public awareness and policy play a crucial role in honeybee conservation. Raising awareness about the importance of honeybees and the threats they face can lead to increased support for conservation initiatives. Public campaigns and educational programs can highlight the role of honeybees in food security and ecosystem health, encouraging community involvement in conservation efforts (Halvorson et al., 2021). Additionally, the establishment of specific laws and regulations to protect honeybees, such as restrictions on pesticide use and the promotion of sustainable beekeeping practices, can provide a framework for effective conservation (Wakgari and Yigezu, 2021). Integrated conservation planning that differentiates between managed and wild honeybee populations is also necessary to address the unique needs of each group and ensure the preservation of genetic diversity (Requier et al., 2019b; Panziera et al., 2022).

8 The Role of Wild Honeybees and Other Pollinators

8.1 Importance of wild honeybee species and their contribution to ecosystems

Wild honeybee species play a crucial role in maintaining the health and stability of ecosystems. They are essential for the pollination of a wide variety of flowering plants, which in turn supports biodiversity and the functioning of natural ecosystems. Wild bees, including wild honeybees, contribute significantly to the reproduction of numerous plant species, which is vital for the survival of many other organisms that depend on these plants for food and habitat (Drossart and Gérard, 2020). The decline of wild bee populations, driven by factors such as habitat loss, climate change, and the introduction of non-native species, poses a significant threat to ecosystem stability and biodiversity (Powney et al., 2019; Mathiasson and Rehan, 2020).

8.2 Interaction between managed honeybees and wild pollinators

The interaction between managed honeybees (Apis mellifera) and wild pollinators is complex and multifaceted. While managed honeybees are crucial for agricultural pollination, their presence can sometimes negatively impact wild pollinator populations. High-density beekeeping can disrupt the structure and functionality of plant-pollinator networks, reducing the diversity of wild pollinators and impairing their pollination services (Valido et al., 2019). Additionally, managed honeybees can compete with wild pollinators for floral resources, potentially leading to reduced foraging success and increased stress for wild bee species (Doublet et al., 2022). However, managed honeybees can also serve as indicators for the health of wild bee populations, as similar environmental stressors affect both groups (Wood et al., 2020).

8.3 Conservation strategies for wild pollinators in the context of honeybee decline

Conservation strategies for wild pollinators are essential, especially in the context of declining honeybee populations. Effective conservation measures include habitat restoration, the establishment of wildflower strips, and the reduction of pesticide use (Tonietto and Larkin, 2018; Drossart and Gérard, 2020). Habitat restoration efforts that focus on increasing the availability and quality of nesting and foraging resources can significantly enhance wild bee abundance and diversity (Tonietto and Larkin, 2018). Additionally, integrated conservation planning that differentiates between managed and wild bee populations is crucial for the protection of local subspecies and genotypes (Requier et al., 2019a). Promoting diverse plant species in agricultural landscapes can also help maintain stable plant-pollinator networks and reduce the vulnerability of pollinator communities to the loss of honeybees (Kovács-Hostyánszki et al., 2019). Implementing these strategies can help mitigate the decline of wild pollinators and ensure the continued provision of essential pollination services.

9 Future Directions in Honeybee Research and Agriculture

9.1 Advances in bee biology and genetics to improve honeybee resilience

Recent research has highlighted the importance of understanding the biological and genetic factors that contribute to honeybee resilience, particularly in the face of global changes such as climate change, landscape alteration, and agricultural intensification (Decourtye et al., 2019). Studies have shown that different honeybee species, such as the Japanese Honeybee (Apis cerana japonica), may exhibit varying levels of resilience to environmental changes compared to the Western Honeybee (Apis mellifera) (Donkersley et al., 2021). This suggests that further genetic and biological studies could uncover traits that enhance resilience, which could be selectively bred or genetically engineered into more vulnerable populations. Additionally, the role of diverse pollen sources and the impact of organic farming on honeybee health and colony performance during periods of floral scarcity have been documented, indicating that a more diverse diet and reduced pesticide exposure can significantly benefit honeybee populations (Wintermantel et al., 2019).

9.2 Innovations in beekeeping practices and technology

Innovative beekeeping practices and technologies are essential for improving the sustainability and productivity of beekeeping. The integration of ecological knowledge with beekeeping practices can enhance crop pollination and honey production. For instance, organic farming practices have been shown to positively affect honeybee colonies by providing a continuous supply of floral resources and reducing pesticide exposure (Wintermantel et al., 2019). Furthermore, the development of supplementary wildflower plantings has been demonstrated to promote the reproduction of alternative pollinators like the blue orchard bee (Osmia lignaria), which can serve as co-pollinators with honeybees in agricultural settings (Boyle et al., 2020). These practices not only support honeybee health but also contribute to the overall resilience of pollination networks.

9.3 The potential of alternative pollinators in supplementing honeybee pollination

The reliance on honeybees for pollination services has raised concerns about the sustainability of agricultural systems, especially given the negative impacts of high-density beekeeping on wild pollinator diversity and ecosystem health (Valido et al., 2019). Research has shown that alternative pollinators, such as the blue orchard bee, can effectively supplement honeybee pollination, particularly when their habitat needs are met through managed wildflower plantings (Boyle et al., 2020). Additionally, habitat restoration efforts have been found to significantly benefit wild bee populations, enhancing their abundance and richness across various habitat types (Tonietto and Larkin, 2018). These findings underscore the potential of integrating alternative pollinators into agricultural practices to reduce the pressure on honeybee populations and improve the resilience of pollination services.

By focusing on these future directions, researchers and practitioners can develop more sustainable and resilient beekeeping and agricultural systems that support both honeybee health and biodiversity.

10 Concluding Remarks

Honeybees (Apis mellifera) are indispensable pollinators, playing a pivotal role in both natural ecosystems and agricultural production. They contribute significantly to the pollination of a wide variety of crops and wild plants, which is essential for food security and biodiversity. The decline in honeybee populations has raised alarms due to their critical role in maintaining ecosystem services and supporting sustainable agriculture.

The decline in honeybee populations poses a severe threat to global food security. As primary pollinators, honeybees are crucial for the production of many crops that constitute a significant portion of the human diet. The reduction in their numbers can lead to decreased crop yields and increased food prices, exacerbating food insecurity worldwide. The combined stress from parasites, pesticides, habitat loss, and climate change has been identified as key factors driving this decline, which could potentially lead to a "pollination crisis".

To mitigate the decline of honeybee populations and ensure their continued role in ecosystems and agriculture, several recommendations are proposed:

Integrated Research Approaches: Future research should adopt a "One-Health" approach, integrating hive-specific solutions with broader ecological and social research to address the multifaceted threats to honeybee health.

Sustainable Agricultural Practices: Reducing the use of harmful pesticides and promoting integrated pest management practices can significantly decrease the stress on honeybee populations.

Habitat Restoration: Enhancing floral resources and restoring natural habitats within agricultural landscapes can provide bees with better foraging opportunities and nesting sites, thereby improving their resilience to environmental stressors.

Policy and Conservation Efforts: Governments should implement and enforce policies that protect pollinator habitats, regulate pesticide use, and support sustainable farming practices. Effective monitoring and quarantine measures are also essential to prevent the spread of bee diseases and parasite.

Public Awareness and Engagement: Increasing public awareness about the importance of honeybees and encouraging community participation in conservation efforts can foster a more supportive environment for pollinator health.

By addressing these areas, we can work towards reversing the decline of honeybee populations and securing their vital contributions to ecosystems and agriculture.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to anonymous peer reviewers for critically reading the manuscript and providing valuable feedback that improved the clarity of the text.

Conflict of Interest Disclosure

The authors affirm that this research was conducted without any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

Abou-Shaara H., 2018, The foraging behaviour of honey bees, Apis mellifera: a review, Veterinarni Medicina, 59: 1-10.

https://doi.org/10.17221/7240-VETMED

Alebachew G., 2018, Economic value of pollination service of agricultural crops in Ethiopia: biological pollinators, Journal of Apicultural Science, 62: 265-273.

https://doi.org/10.2478/jas-2018-0024

Alomar D., González-Estévez M., Traveset A., and Lázaro A., 2018, The intertwined effects of natural vegetation, local flower community, and pollinator diversity on the production of almond trees, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 264: 34-43.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.05.004

Bareke T., and Addi A., 2019, Effect of honeybee pollination on seed and fruit yield of agricultural crops in Ethiopia, MOJ Ecology & Environmental Sciences, 4(5): 205-209.

https://doi.org/10.15406/mojes.2019.04.00155

Basu S., and Cetzal-IX W., 2018, Call of the wild: conservation of natural insect pollinators should be a priority, Biodiversity, 19: 240-243.

https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2018.1523747

Becher M., Twiston-Davies G., Penny T., Goulson D., Rotheray E., and Osborne J., 2018, Bumble-BEEHAVE: a systems model for exploring multifactorial causes of bumblebee decline at individual, colony, population and community level, Journal of Applied Ecology, 55: 2790-2801.

https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13165

Boyle N., Artz D., Lundin O., Ward K., Picklum D., Wardell G., Williams N., and Pitts-Singer T., 2020, Wildflower plantings promote blue orchard bee, Osmia lignaria (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae), reproduction in California almond orchards, Ecology and Evolution, 10: 3189-3199.

https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5952

Celis-Diez J., García C., Armesto J., Abades S., Garratt M., and Fontúrbel F., 2023, Wild floral visitors are more important than honeybees as pollinators of avocado crops, Agronomy, 13(7): 1722.

https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13071722

Champetier A., Lee H., and Sumner D., 2019, Honey, forage and almond-pollinating honey bees, Choices, 34: 1-8.

https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.296572

Dáttilo W., Cruz C., Luna P., Ratoni B., Hinojosa-Díaz I., Neves F., Leponce M., Villalobos F., and Guevara R., 2022, The impact of the honeybee Apis mellifera on the organization of pollination networks is positively related with its interactive role throughout its geographic range, Diversity, 14(11): 917.

https://doi.org/10.3390/d14110917

Decourtye A., Alaux C., Conte Y., and Henry M., 2019, Toward the protection of bees and pollination under global change: present and future perspectives in a challenging applied science, Current Opinion in Insect Science, 35: 123-131.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2019.07.008

Donkersley P., Covell L., and Ota T., 2021, Japanese honeybees (Apis cerana japonica Radoszkowski, 1877) may be resilient to land use change, Insects, 12(8): 685.

https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12080685

Donkersley P., Elsner-Adams E., and Maderson S., 2020, A one-health model for reversing honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) decline, Veterinary Sciences, 7(3): 119.

https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci7030119

Doublet V., Doyle T., Refoy I., Hedges S., Carvell C., Brown M., and Wilfert L., 2022, Increasing flower species richness in agricultural landscapes alters insect pollinator networks: implications for bee health and competition, Ecology and Evolution, 12(10): e9442.

https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9442

Drossart M., and Gérard M., 2020, Beyond the decline of wild bees: optimizing conservation measures and bringing together the actors, Insects, 11(9): 649.

https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11090649

El-Seedi H., El-Wahed A., Yosri N., Musharraf S., Chen L., Moustafa M., Zou X., Guo Z., and Khatib A., 2022, Honeybee products: an updated review of chemical profiles, biological properties and health benefits, Food Bioscience, 49: 101915.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2022.101915

Eeraerts M., Smagghe G., and Meeus I., 2020, Pollinator diversity, floral resources and semi-natural habitat, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 294: 106878.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2020.106878

Garbuzov M., and Ratnieks F., 2018, Quantifying variation among garden plants in attractiveness to bees and other flower-visiting insects, Functional Ecology, 28(2): 364-374.

https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12178

Goulson D., Nicholls E., Botías C., and Rotheray E., 2015, Bee declines driven by combined stress from parasites, pesticides, and lack of flowers, Science, 347(6229): 1255957.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255957

Hassan A., Naz F., and Qureshi A., 2021, Influence of pesticides on honeybee population and pollination services in Pakistan, Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 28(9): 5201-5207.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.06.045

Herrera C., 2020, Gradual replacement of wild bees by honeybees in flowers of the Mediterranean Basin over the last 50 years, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 287(1921): 20192657.

https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.2657

Hilpert A., Bartomeus I., and Blüthgen N., 2021, Flower visitors and pollination services across agricultural landscapes: the importance of plant and pollinator diversity, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 307: 107228.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2020.107228

Huang J., Huang Y., and Zhang L., 2023, Effects of climate change on pollinator distribution and crop pollination, Environmental Research, 216: 114594.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.114594

Inari N., Nagamitsu T., Kenta T., Goka K., and Hiura T., 2018, Spatial and temporal pattern of introduced honeybee density in natural habitats in Japan, Biological Conservation, 141(9): 2178-2186.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.06.016

Klein A., Vaissière B., Cane J., Steffan-Dewenter I., Cunningham S., Kremen C., and Tscharntke T., 2007, Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274(1608): 303-313.

https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3721

Leonhardt S., and Blüthgen N., 2018, The same, but different: pollen foraging in honeybee and bumblebee colonies, Apidologie, 43(4): 449-464.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-011-0112-y

Mallinger R., Gaines-Day H., and Gratton C., 2017, Do managed bees have negative effects on wild bees? A systematic review of the literature, PLoS ONE, 12(12): e0189268.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189268

Mallinger R., Werts P., and Gratton C., 2019, Bee visitation rates to apple flowers differ by pollinator taxa and orchard management, Environmental Entomology, 48(2): 357-366.

https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/nvy188

Morandin L., and Winston M., 2005, Wild bee abundance and seed production in conventional, organic, and genetically modified canola, Ecological Applications, 15(3): 871-881.

https://doi.org/10.1890/03-5271

Naeem A., Naseer M., and Khan M., 2020, Role of native pollinators in agricultural productivity under changing climate, Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 27(12): 3251-3258.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.09.025

Ogilvie J., and Forrest J., 2017, Interactions between bee foraging and floral resource phenology shape plant–pollinator network dynamics, Ecology Letters, 20(9): 1119-1130.

https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12815

Potts S., Biesmeijer J., Kremen C., Neumann P., Schweiger O., and Kunin W., 2010, Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25(6): 345--353.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007

Ricketts T., Regetz J., Steffan-Dewenter I., Cunningham S., Kremen C., Bogdanski A., Gemmill-Herren B., Greenleaf S., Klein A., Mayfield M., Morandin L., Ochieng A., and Viana B., 2008, Landscape effects on crop pollination services: are there general patterns?, Ecology Letters, 11(5): 499-515.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01157.x

Senapathi D., Biesmeijer J., Breeze T., Kleijn D., Potts S., and Carvalheiro L., 2015, Pollinator conservation—the importance of managing the landscape for pollinator diversity, Current Opinion in Insect Science, 12: 44-51.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2015.09.005

Taki H., Kevan P., and Ascher J., 2019, Landscape heterogeneity and climate affect bee diversity and abundance in agricultural landscapes, Biological Conservation, 231: 36-43.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.12.006

Woodcock B., Garratt M., Powney G., Shaw R., Osborne J., Soroka J., Lindström S., Stanley D., and Potts S., 2019, Meta-analysis reveals that pollinator functional diversity and abundance enhance crop pollination and yield, Nature Communications, 10: 1489.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09393-6

Yokoi T., and Kato M., 2021, Effects of forest disturbance on wild bee communities and pollination in Japanese landscapes, Ecological Research, 36(5): 857-869.

https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1703.12231